AdrMcp

AdrMcp

Table of Contents

• Features
• The problem
• The solution
• Storage & format
• Tools
• Configuration
• Run
• Usage
• Claude skills
• Develop
• Continuous integration
• Project layout
• Tech Stack
• Roadmap
• Contributing

Getting Started

Prerequisites

• .NET SDK

Run

git clone https://github.com/Atypical-Consulting/AdrMcp.git
cd AdrMcp
dotnet restore
dotnet build
dotnet run --project AdrMcp/AdrMcp.csproj

Every architectural decision, on the record — an MCP server that turns a folder of Markdown ADRs into live tools your AI agent can use: search, author, validate, link, and trace decisions.

🌐 atypical-consulting.github.io/AdrMcp

Features

• Read & search ADRs — list_adrs, get_adr, search_adrs (lexical or semantic), and get_adr_index for the full decision timeline.
• Author from a template — create_adr drafts MADR- or Nygard-format ADRs; update_adr replaces or appends a single section.
• Lifecycle-aware transitions — set_status enforces the ADR lifecycle; supersede_adr creates the replacement and marks/links the old one superseded in a single call.
• Relationship graph & staleness detection — find_related_adrs / get_adr_graph expose links and supersession chains; find_stale_adrs flags ADRs whose code_refs no longer resolve in the codebase.
• Conflict & coverage analysis — detect_conflicts surfaces contradictory accepted decisions; coverage_report highlights ADR coverage gaps by architectural area.
• Preview-by-default writes — every mutating tool defaults to previewOnly: true and returns a unified diff before anything touches disk.
• Ships as a dotnet tool, NuGet package, and Docker image, plus three bundled Claude Code skills (adr-author, adr-review, adr-supersede) for the judgment layer on top of the raw tools.

The problem

Architectural decisions get made in Slack threads, PR comments, and someone's head — then the reasoning evaporates. Months later a teammate asks "why is it done this way?", nobody remembers, and the decision gets silently re-litigated or accidentally reversed. ADRs fix that — if they're written and kept honest. But a folder of Markdown files is inert: you can't ask it what's still accepted, trace what superseded what, or notice a decision that no longer matches the code.

It's worse with AI coding agents: the one collaborator that could keep decisions current has no way to read, write, or reason about them.

The solution

AdrMcp makes that folder a live surface any MCP client can work. It gives your agent tools to list and search decisions, draft new ones from a MADR template, validate structure and links, supersede a decision while preserving its history, and flag stale or conflicting ones — all preview-by-default, so nothing is written without you seeing the diff.

The records stay plain Markdown in git; AdrMcp adds the tools. Built as a .NET 10 stdio MCP server, architecturally modeled on RoselineMCP — layered Tools → Services, [McpServerTool] attributes, shipped as a dotnet tool + Docker image.

Storage & format

ADRs are markdown files under an ADR root (default docs/adr/), one file per decision named NNNN-kebab-title.md, using MADR 4.0 frontmatter + sections:

---
id: 1
title: Use PostgreSQL for persistence
status: accepted          # proposed | accepted | rejected | deprecated | superseded
date: 2026-07-08
tags: [data]
links:
  - { type: superseded-by, target: 5 }
code_refs:
  - { path: src/Data/Repository.cs, symbol: PostgresRepository }
---

# Use PostgreSQL for persistence

## Context and Problem Statement
...
## Decision Outcome
...
## Consequences
...

Everything is git-native, human-readable, and diff-able — no database.

Tools

Tool	Kind	Description
list_adrs	read	List/filter ADRs (status, tag, date range)
get_adr	read	Get one ADR; optionally only selected ## sections
search_adrs	read	Lexical (default) or semantic term-vector search
get_adr_index	read	The decision log / timeline
find_related_adrs	read	Incoming/outgoing links + supersession chain
get_adr_graph	read	Full relationship graph (nodes + typed edges)
create_adr	write	Create an ADR from a template (madr or nygard)
update_adr	write	Replace/append a single ## section
set_status	write	Transition status (enforces the lifecycle)
supersede_adr	write	Create replacement + mark old superseded + link, in one call
link_adrs	write	Typed link between two ADRs (adds inverse)
validate_adr	read	MADR compliance: sections, status, dangling links, duplicate ids
detect_conflicts	read	Explicit conflicts-with + highly similar accepted ADRs
find_stale_adrs	read	ADRs whose code_refs no longer resolve
coverage_report	read	ADR coverage per architectural area (tag); surfaces gaps
suggest_adr_from_change	read	Draft an ADR proposal from a unified diff
render_index	write	Regenerate the browsable README.md decision index
diff_adr	read	Diff two ADRs, or a file vs its canonical rendering

Writes are preview-by-default. Every mutating tool takes previewOnly (default true) and returns a unified diff of the intended change; pass previewOnly=false to write to disk.

Configuration

Resolved in order: CLI arg → env var → default.

Setting	CLI	Env	Default
ADR root	--adr-root <path>	ADR_ROOT	<repo>/docs/adr
Repo root (for code_refs)	--repo-root <path>	ADR_REPO_ROOT	current directory

Code-linking is provider-based

find_stale_adrs resolves code_refs through an ICodeLinkProvider. The default FileSystemCodeLinkProvider is language-agnostic (a ref resolves if the file exists and, when a symbol is given, that symbol's text is present). A Roslyn (.NET) or codebase-memory provider can be plugged in behind the same interface — deep symbol resolution stays the client's job.

Run

# from source
dotnet run --project AdrMcp -- --adr-root ./docs/adr

# as a global tool
dotnet tool install -g AdrMcp
adr-mcp --adr-root ./docs/adr

MCP client config

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "adr": {
      "command": "adr-mcp",
      "args": ["--adr-root", "/path/to/repo/docs/adr", "--repo-root", "/path/to/repo"]
    }
  }
}

Docker

docker build -t adr-mcp .
docker run --rm -i -v "$PWD:/workspace" adr-mcp --adr-root /workspace/docs/adr

Usage

Once adr-mcp is registered as an MCP server, an agent calls its tools directly. A typical read-then-write flow:

// "What ADRs do we have about data storage?"
list_adrs({ "tag": "data" })
// → [{ "id": 5, "title": "Use PostgreSQL for persistence", "status": "accepted", "tags": ["data"] }]

// "Draft a decision for switching to gRPC internally" — nothing is written yet
create_adr({
  "title": "Adopt gRPC for internal services",
  "template": "madr",
  "previewOnly": true
})
// → unified diff of the new docs/adr/0006-adopt-grpc-for-internal-services.md

// Once the content looks right, write it for real
create_adr({ "title": "Adopt gRPC for internal services", "template": "madr", "previewOnly": false })

// Later, retire an old decision in favor of a new one, preserving history
supersede_adr({ "oldId": 2, "newTitle": "Replace REST gateway with gRPC", "previewOnly": false })

Claude skills

Three project skills under .claude/skills/ add the judgment/workflow layer on top of the MCP tools (the server provides the mechanics; the skills provide the craft). They activate automatically in Claude Code when the connected AdrMcp server is available:

Skill	Triggers on	What it does
adr-author	"write an ADR", "record this decision"	Decide if a decision warrants an ADR, frame a sharp Context/Decision/Consequences, draft via create_adr + validate_adr
adr-review	"review this ADR", "does this decision hold up"	Structural + substantive critique against a rubric, using validate_adr / detect_conflicts
adr-supersede	"we changed our mind", "retire this decision"	Pick the right lifecycle move and drive supersede_adr / set_status with correct linking

Develop

dotnet build AdrMcp.slnx
dotnet test AdrMcp.slnx        # unit tests + MCP-over-stdio integration tests
dotnet pack AdrMcp/AdrMcp.csproj -c Release -o ./artifacts

Continuous integration

CI/CD runs on GitHub Actions, modeled on RoselineMCP:

Workflow	Trigger	What it does
ci.yml	push / PR to main/dev	Build + test matrix (ubuntu/windows/macos); 80% line-coverage gate on ubuntu
codeql.yml	push / PR / weekly	CodeQL security analysis (C#)
pages.yml	push to site/** on dev	Publish the landing page to GitHub Pages
release-please.yml	push to dev	Maintain a release PR (Conventional Commits); on merge, publish NuGet + MCPB + MCP Registry + GHCR image

Releases are automated with release-please: merge the release PR it opens to ship. See PUBLISH.md.

Project layout

AdrMcp/
├── Interfaces/   service contracts (IAdrRepository, ICodeLinkProvider, …)
├── Services/     repository, templates, validation, graph, search, embeddings, code-links
├── Tools/        Navigation / Authoring / Intelligence / Utility MCP tools
├── Models/       Adr, AdrStatus, AdrLink, CodeRef, response DTOs
└── Program.cs    DI wiring + stdio MCP host

---

Tech Stack

• .NET 10
• ModelContextProtocol
• xunit
• xunit.runner.visualstudio
• DiffPlex
• Markdig
• Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting
• YamlDotNet

Roadmap

• Real embedding-backed semantic search for search_adrs / detect_conflicts (beyond term-vector similarity)
• Roslyn-based ICodeLinkProvider for deep C# symbol resolution in find_stale_adrs
• Additional ADR templates beyond MADR/Nygard (e.g. Y-statements)
• Editor extension (VS Code / JetBrains) to browse and visualize the decision graph
• Broaden the CI coverage gate and publish to additional package registries

See the open issues for details and to propose new ideas.

Atypical MCP servers

Part of a suite of Model Context Protocol servers by Atypical Consulting:

• RoselineMCP — Roslyn code intelligence for AI agents
• ASTral — structured code retrieval (tree-sitter)
• AdrMcp — Architecture Decision Records over MCP
• MarkdownInk — Markdown rendering for the terminal

Contributing

Contributions are welcome. Open an issue first to discuss any significant change.

1. Fork the repository and create your branch (git checkout -b feat/my-feature)
2. Commit your changes (git commit -m 'feat: ...')
3. Push the branch and open a Pull Request

---

Built by Atypical Consulting. We also make NuGetKeep, a self-hosted NuGet server with supply-chain quarantine.