npm reelierstdioMITupdated 14d ago
Your agents worked all night. Here's exactly what changed.
What can you do with Reelier?
Reelier
Let your agents write. Keep the receipts.
Your agents worked all night. Here's exactly what changed.
Reelier records the run that worked, freezes it as a replayable skill, and replays it deterministically โ every run comes back as a receipt: proof of what the agent did and what changed because of it. Agents make claims. Reelier writes receipts.
โถ watch with sound (27s)
Receipts on your agent PRs โ install and done
Agent-authored PRs (Dependabot, Claude, Codex, Cursor, โฆ) get a receipt comment in seconds: author, files changed, declared scope vs. what actually changed, sensitive paths flagged. No workflow file, no CLI, no config.
โ Install the Reelier receipts GitHub App โ free on public repos, forever.
Reelier receipt โ agent PR Author:
dependabot[bot]ยท Files changed: 2 (+119 โ41) Declared scope: none (add.reelier/scope.ymlto enable unexpected-write detection) Sensitive paths touched: โ 1 โpackage-lock.jsonProves scope and change, not correctness
A real receipt from Reelier's own repos โ see one live. Declare scope per agent in .reelier/scope.yml (or a reelier-scope block in the PR body) and the receipt reports unexpected writes. The receipt proves scope and change, never correctness or safety.
Why
AI agents are non-deterministic โ the same prompt, a different result every run โ and they'll claim they did the work whether they did or not. Reelier records the run that worked, replays it deterministically, and writes a signed receipt that proves it. Point it at your existing CI in one workflow โ it adds a verifiable receipt, it doesn't replace your stack.
Measured on a real head-to-head benchmark, same task, same data (full method):
- 1,000 / 1,000 replays byte-identical
- Every replay ships a signed receipt โ proof of what ran and what changed, never a claim
- 0 LLM calls at replay โ deterministic re-execution, not re-reasoning
Deterministic replay is also ~50ร cheaper and ~59ร faster than re-running the agent, on the same benchmark.
Install
npm i -g reelier && reelier init
# No Node install needed โ same commands via Docker:
docker run --rm ghcr.io/seldonframe/reelier --help
reelier init [--dry-run] performs one checkpointed local inspection across all three Reelier paths: Path A observation coverage, Path B replay/freeze candidates, and Path C boundable/outcome-capable/shadow-only/unsupported connections and candidates. It does not deploy, gate, dispatch, upload, copy credentials, or rewrite host configuration. --dry-run writes nothing; the normal command writes only sanitized artifacts below .reelier/init/.
As an agent plugin
Teach your coding agent when to reach for Reelier. Same two commands, either host:
claude plugin marketplace add seldonframe/reelier
claude plugin install reelier@seldonframe
codex plugin marketplace add seldonframe/reelier
codex plugin add reelier@seldonframe
This installs two Agent Skills and nothing else. reelier-replay teaches your agent to freeze a
repeatable tool-call job and replay it at 0 tokens. reelier-write-safety covers bounding an
agent's writes before you grant them: what the recorder sees, what a policy refuses, and what a
receipt does and does not prove. It ships no MCP servers, so it does not wrap, observe, or gate
any tool call on its own; the reelier CLI does that, and the skills drive it via npx. Packaged in both the Agent Plugins v1.0.0 format (plugin/agent-plugins/) and the Claude Code format (plugin/claude/), generated from one source by scripts/build-plugin-packages.mjs.
Verified end to end on codex-cli 0.147.0-alpha.1.2: both formats install, enable, and the skill reaches the model. Other hosts are untested, and per-host status is tracked in docs/specs/agent-plugins-coverage-v1.md ยง4 rather than claimed here.
How to use it
reelier init --dry-run # inspect Path A/B/C locally; write nothing
reelier init # persist resumable sanitized inspection artifacts
reelier run <name>.skill.md # replay deterministically โ 0 tokens (read-only by default)
reelier diff <name> # SAME or DRIFTED, per step โ exit 1 on drift
reelier push <name>.skill.md # sync receipts to your ledger (opt-in)
reelier ci # write a workflow: drift-CI + PR receipts, one command
- Inspect, then record or freeze.
reelier initreveals observed coverage and local candidates without changing routes.reelier mcp --wrap "<mcp server>"proxies live tools;reelier scan/from-sessionfreezes supported history. - Compile.
reelier compileturns a trace into aSKILL.mdโ 0 LLM calls, minimal assertions, honest gaps printed as Open questions. - Replay.
reelier runreplays it at Level 0 โ no LLM, byte-identical, read-only by default (writes need--allow-writes). - Diff.
reelier diffreports SAME or DRIFTED per step, with the failing assertion as the why โ exit 1 on drift. - Log in.
reelier loginconnects this machine to Reelier Cloud with a device code in your browser โ or setREELIER_CLOUD_URL/REELIER_CLOUD_KEYfor CI and self-hosting. - Push. Every run is a receipt;
reelier pushoptionally syncs it to a ledger for a permalink and an embeddable verified-replay badge.
Already have an Agent Skill? Convert it โ your skill, minus the model:
reelier compile trace.jsonl --from-skill ./my-skill/SKILL.md
Three tests, one skill
| Test | Command | Answers |
|---|---|---|
| Determinism | reelier run <skill.md> |
Does this still do what it did? |
| Recovery | reelier run <skill.md> --fail N |
If this broke, would the skill notice and heal? |
| Drift | reelier run <skill.md> --wrap "<your mcp server>" |
Has the world moved out from under this skill? |
Taxonomy due to Mads Hansen's review of the launch post. Full semantics for each test, including recovery injection and manifest guardrails: docs/REFERENCE.md.
Gate Dependabot / Renovate bump PRs
Dependabot and Renovate open the PR and run your test suite โ but neither knows what your agent actually does at runtime, so a dependency bump that silently changes a tool call's shape (a renamed field, a new default, a different error) sails through with green unit tests. This is the check they don't run.
Copy .github/workflows/reelier-bump-check.yml into your repo, point skill: at your own recorded .skill.md file(s), and it will: gate to PRs from dependabot[bot]/renovate[bot] (or a dependencies label), install the bumped dependency, replay your recorded skill live against it at --max-level 0 (0 tokens), and fail the check on the exact step that drifted.
This tests dependency and MCP-tool-call behavior โ it does not test model upgrades; --max-level 0 never calls an LLM. Full listing copy and setup: docs/marketplace-listing.md.
Prove it
A pushed receipt carries a ladder of independently-verifiable claims โ not one blanket "verified." Depending on what you turn on, it can be signed, timestamped, CI-attested, and carry cross-checkable provider request-ids. reelier verify recomputes every claim offline, and a claim you haven't enabled just renders as an honest gap, never a shamed one.
See a real one: reelier.com/r/HWBdmGob9KeHRqXi-OEaRD0z.
Full 8-rung ladder, what each rung does and doesn't prove: docs/REFERENCE.md.
If your skills are employees
| Employee lifecycle | Reelier equivalent |
|---|---|
| Skillify a session | reelier from-session |
| Performance review | reelier run + reelier diff |
| Fleet maintenance | scheduled replays + drift alerts |
| The record | signed receipts |
"Verified" describes the record, never the agent โ a receipt proves what ran and what changed, not that the agent was good at its job.
An employment contract doesn't make an employee good โ it makes what they did visible and bounded. Same here: receipts prove scope and change, never correctness.
Who it's for
- Solo dev / OSS maintainer โ a real regression test again; drift can't pass silently.
- Team shipping agent changes โ "it ran clean" becomes a checkable PR artifact, not a claim.
- Agency running agents for clients โ signed, timestamped proof-of-delivery a client can verify.
- Marketplace buyer or seller โ corroborated receipts are reviews that can't be astroturfed.
- Audit-facing ops โ a signed, CI-attested trail of every write, idempotency key included.
MIT, free forever (versions โค0.16.0 remain AGPL-3.0). Your data โ skills, traces, runs โ is specified in SPEC.md, so leaving is copying a folder.
Contributing: issues and PRs welcome โ SPEC.md is the source of truth for formats; fix the code, not the spec. npm test before a PR.
If Reelier saved you a re-run, star it โญ โ it's how other builders find it.
Install
Add Reelier to your client. Pick the one you use.
claude mcp add reelier -- npx -y reeliercodex mcp add reelier -- npx -y reelieramp mcp add reelier -- npx -y reelier{
"mcpServers": {
"reelier": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"reelier"
]
}
}
}Add to `claude_desktop_config.json`, then restart Claude Desktop.
{
"mcpServers": {
"reelier": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"reelier"
]
}
}
}Add to `~/.cursor/mcp.json`, or `.cursor/mcp.json` for a single project.
code --add-mcp '{"name":"reelier","command":"npx","args":["-y","reelier"]}'Or add the block manually to `.vscode/mcp.json` under `servers`.
{
"mcpServers": {
"reelier": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"reelier"
]
}
}
}Add to `~/.codeium/windsurf/mcp_config.json`.
{
"mcpServers": {
"reelier": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"reelier"
]
}
}
}Add to `cline_mcp_settings.json` via the MCP Servers panel.
{
"mcpServers": {
"reelier": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"reelier"
]
}
}
}Add to `~/.gemini/settings.json`.
{
"mcpServers": {
"reelier": {
"type": "local",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"reelier"
],
"tools": [
"*"
]
}
}
}Add to `~/.copilot/mcp-config.json`, or run `/mcp add` inside the CLI.
{
"context_servers": {
"reelier": {
"command": {
"path": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"reelier"
]
}
}
}
}Add to your Zed `settings.json`.
npx -y reelierRun `goose configure`, choose **Add Extension โ Command-line Extension**, and paste this command.
Score
39 / 100
Incomplete
- Documentation25/25
- Maintenance19/25
- Trust16/20
- Capability0/15
- Install experience12/15
- Documents what it does and how to connect
- Has a resolvable package or endpoint
- Exposes at least one tool, prompt or resource
- README has substantive content
- Includes a code example
- Documents its configuration
- Mentions credentials or security posture
- Last commit 7 days ago
- Has a release history
- Repository is not archived
- Licensed MIT
- Namespace verified in the official MCP registry
- Claimed by its owner
- Published under an organisation
- 0 tool(s) documented
- Provides prompt templates
- Provides resources
- 12 documented install method(s)
- Published to a package registry
- Offers a hosted endpoint โ no local install
Version history
| Versions | Published |
|---|---|
| 0.24.0Latest | Aug 1, 2026 |
| 0.13.0 | Jul 21, 2026 |